Nature●●●●●Difficulty 3 of 5

Could a complex eye like ours really evolve one small step at a time?

Darwin himself admitted the idea seemed 'absurd in the highest possible degree'. Yet a deliberately pessimistic calculation later found a full eye could evolve from a patch of light-sensing cells in under 364,000 years.

▶ Start the story

Yes, and Darwin himself showed why it isn't impossible. In On the Origin of Species, in 1859, he admitted that the eye evolving by natural selection seemed, at first glance, absurd in the highest possible degree, echoing the philosopher William Paley, who in 1802 had called the eye a miracle of design. But Darwin laid out the escape hatch: if a chain of small gradations connects a simple, imperfect eye to a complex one, each step useful to the animal that has it, and if those variations are inherited, then a complex eye built by natural selection is not ruled out, however hard it is to picture. He sketched a stepwise path, from an optic nerve merely coated with pigment up to a moderately sophisticated eye, and pointed to living animals as examples of the stages in between.

The fossil record fits that picture. The oldest certain fossilized eye, found in Estonia and dated to about 530 million years ago, already looks much like the compound eye of a modern dragonfly or bee, just with its individual light-sensing units spaced farther apart and missing a lens entirely. By the time of the Burgess Shale, not much later, a striking diversity of eyes had already evolved, and complex, image-forming eyes are now known to have evolved independently more than once across different animal lineages, rather than being invented just a single time.

This sudden flourishing of eyes lines up with the Cambrian explosion, the burst of rapid evolutionary diversification seen in the fossil record. One proposed explanation, the 'Light Switch' hypothesis, suggests that once advanced eyes evolved, they kicked off a predator-and-prey arms race that accelerated evolution across the board, since before that point, animals may have sensed light without yet using it for fast movement or visual navigation.

The strongest answer to Darwin's own doubt, though, is mathematical. Scientists have tried to estimate how long it would actually take a patch of light-sensing cells to evolve, step by tiny step, into a fully functional vertebrate eye, based on rates of mutation, the advantage each step gives, and natural selection. Even overestimating the time for every stage and assuming one generation a year, the answer that comes out is startlingly short: less than 364,000 years, a blink of an eye, so to speak, on the scale of geological time.

< 364,000 yrs

for a flat light-sensing patch to evolve into a full eye, even with pessimistic assumptions

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.How did Darwin resolve his own doubt that the eye seemed 'absurd' to have evolved by natural selection?
  2. 2.What did the oldest certain fossilized eye, from a 530-million-year-old fossil in Estonia, actually look like?
  3. 3.Why is the 364,000-year estimate for eye evolution considered a strong result?

Recap

Darwin resolved his own doubt about the eye by arguing that if every small intermediate step is useful on its own, a complex eye is not actually impossible to evolve gradually.

Surprising fact · A deliberately pessimistic scientific estimate found a full vertebrate eye could evolve from a simple light-sensing patch in under 364,000 years.

Sources (1)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (17 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Evolution of the eye · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🐳 Nature (3) See all nature lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗