Philosophy●●●●●Difficulty 4 of 5

How did Plato map four levels of knowledge onto one line?

Plato once asked a friend to imagine cutting a single line into four pieces, and used the cuts to rank everything from shadows to pure reason by how real it actually is.

▶ Start the story

In Plato's Republic, Socrates asks his companion Glaucon to picture something deceptively simple: a single line, cut into two unequal pieces, with each of those pieces then cut again in the same proportion. That one image became one of the most compact maps of knowledge in philosophy, because Plato uses the four resulting segments to rank everything a mind can know, from least real to most real.

The bottom two segments cover the visible world. The very lowest piece is images: shadows, reflections in water, anything that is just a copy of a copy. Plato calls the kind of knowing that deals with these mere conjecture. The next segment up covers actual physical things, the animals, plants and objects that cast those shadows and reflections, which Plato calls belief. Together, conjecture and belief make up what he calls opinion, our ordinary, everyday grip on a changing world.

The top two segments cover the intelligible world, the world of ideas rather than things. The lower of these is mathematical reasoning: thinking about abstract objects like perfect geometric lines, which are not the same as the imperfect lines you might draw on paper. The highest and final segment is pure philosophical understanding, reached by reason alone through careful argument, not resting on any assumption but climbing toward the most fundamental principle of all.

The line's four segments
  1. Step 1: Eikasia

    Shadows, reflections: conjecture

  2. Step 2: Pistis

    Physical objects: belief

  3. Step 3: Dianoia

    Mathematical objects: reasoning

  4. Step 4: Noesis

    The Ideas themselves: understanding

The point of the whole structure is a single comparison: a shadow is to the object that casts it what the whole physical world is to the world of Ideas, or Forms. Each step up the line is more real and more true than the one below, and Plato goes as far as denying that the changing world of the lowest level can be known at all. Understanding, for him, isn't one thing: it's a ladder, topped by knowledge of the Form of the Good.

Quiz me

0/3

  1. 1.What are the four segments of Plato's divided line, from lowest to highest?
  2. 2.Why does Plato deny that the lowest level, the world of becoming and passing away, can be truly known?
  3. 3.What distinguishes the highest segment of the line, philosophical understanding (noesis), from the mathematical reasoning (dianoia) just below it?

Recap

Each level of the divided line is more real than the one below it: shadows are less real than objects, and objects are less real, for Plato, than the unchanging Ideas behind them.

Surprising fact · Plato denied that the ordinary, ever-changing physical world could be truly known at all, since knowledge for him required something permanent to grasp onto.

Sources (1)

No source, no claim. Every fact in this lesson (19 claims) cites at least one of these.

  1. [1]Analogy of the divided line · Wikipedia
More lessons in 🤔 Philosophy (3) See all philosophy lessons →

One more light on your map.

Get one lesson like this every day, about the things you love. Free, in two or five minutes.

Get the share card for this lesson ↗